↓ Skip to main content

Response of religious groups to HIV/AIDS as a sexually transmitted infection in Trinidad

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response of religious groups to HIV/AIDS as a sexually transmitted infection in Trinidad
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-5-121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian L Genrich, Brader A Brathwaite

Abstract

HIV/AIDS-related stigma and discrimination are significant determinants of HIV transmission in the Caribbean island nation of Trinidad and Tobago (T&T), where the adult HIV/AIDS prevalence is 2.5%. T&T is a spiritually-aware society and over 104 religious groups are represented. This religious diversity creates a complex social environment for the transmission of a sexually transmitted infection like HIV/AIDS. Religious leaders are esteemed in T&T's society and may use their position and frequent interactions with the public to promote HIV/AIDS awareness, fight stigma and discrimination, and exercise compassion for people living with HIV/AIDS (PWHA). Some religious groups have initiated HIV/AIDS education programs within their membership, but previous studies suggest that HIV/AIDS remains a stigmatized infection in many religious organizations. The present study investigates how the perception of HIV/AIDS as a sexually transmitted infection impacts religious representatives' incentives to respond to HIV/AIDS in their congregations and communities. In correlation, the study explores how the experiences of PWHA in religious gatherings impact healing and coping with HIV/AIDS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 142 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 20%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 30 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Psychology 15 10%
Arts and Humanities 8 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 31 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2013.
All research outputs
#12,560,690
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,533
of 14,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,056
of 48,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.