↓ Skip to main content

Cetuximab ameliorates suppressive phenotypes of myeloid antigen presenting cells in head and neck cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cetuximab ameliorates suppressive phenotypes of myeloid antigen presenting cells in head and neck cancer patients
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40425-015-0097-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Li, Raghvendra M. Srivastava, Abhinav Ettyreddy, Robert L. Ferris

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and M2 monocytes/macrophages are two types of suppressive myeloid antigen presenting cells that have been shown to promote tumor progression and correlate with poor prognosis in cancer patients. Tumor antigen specific monoclonal antibodies (mAb) have emerged as important agents for cancer therapy. In addition to the direct inhibition of tumor growth, the Fc portions of the therapeutic mAbs, such as the IgG1 portion of the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mAb cetuximab, might interact with the Fc-gamma receptors (FcγR) on myeloid cells and modulate their suppressive activity. Patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) on the UPCI 08-013 NCT01218048 trial were treated with single-agent cetuximab before surgery. Blood were collected pre- and post-cetuximab treatment to analyze frequency of monocytic MDSC (CD11b(+)CD14(+)HLA-DR(lo/-)), granulocytic MDSC (LIN(-)CD11b(+)CD15(+)) and CD11b(+)CD14(+)HLA-DR(hi) monocytes by flow cytometry. Besides, CD11b(+)CD14(+)HLA-DR(hi) monocytes were sorted for qPCR analysis of IL-10 and IL-12B transcripts. MDSC were generated in vitro with or without coated hIgG1 and tested for suppressive activity in mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR). Naïve monocytes from HNSCC patients co-cultured with tumor cell lines in the presence of cetuximab or hIgG1 were analyzed for M1/2 surface markers and cytokines. We observed significantly increased monocytic MDSC in non-responders and decreased granulocytic MDSC in responders after cetuximab treatment. In addition, circulating CD11b(+)CD14(+)HLA-DR(hi) monocytes of cetuximab responders displayed attenuated M2 polarization, with decreased CD163(+) expression and IL-10 transcripts after cetuximab treatment. This beneficial effect appeared to be FcγR dependent, since CD16 ligation reproduced the reversal of suppressive activity of MDSC in vitro. CD14(+) naïve monocytes from the co-cultures of tumor cells, cetuximab and HNSCC patient PBMC or purified monocytes were skewed to an M1-like phenotype, with increased expression of HLA-DR, CD86 and production of IL-12 p70. Likewise, reduced M2 features (expression of CD163 and production of IL-10) were found after crosslinking CD16 on the surface of monocytes to cetuximab-coated tumor cells. Our studies demonstrate a novel function of cetuximab in ameliorating suppressive phenotypes of FcγR bearing myeloid cells in cancer patients, which is associated with better clinical outcome of cetuximab-treated patients. #NCT01218048. Registered 7 October 2010.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,884,096
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#2,630
of 3,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,875
of 393,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#73
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.