You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Language and rigour in qualitative research: Problems and principles in analyzing data collected in Mandarin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-8-44 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen J Smith, Jing Chen, Xiaoyun Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 209 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 20% |
| Unknown | 54 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 51 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 61 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,318,879
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#951
of 2,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,139
of 82,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.