↓ Skip to main content

Investigation of ossification in the posterior longitudinal ligament using micro-focus X-ray CT scanning and histological examination

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigation of ossification in the posterior longitudinal ligament using micro-focus X-ray CT scanning and histological examination
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13000-015-0440-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katsunori Fukutake, Takao Ishiwatari, Hiroshi Takahashi, Kazuaki Tsuchiya, Yoichiro Okubo, Minoru Shinozaki, Naobumi Tochigi, Megumi Wakayama, Tetsuo Nemoto, Kazutoshi Shibuya, Akihito Wada

Abstract

Ossification in the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) correlates with changes of enthesis during the early stages of development, but this issue remains controversial, as little is known regarding the details of this process. The aim of the present study was to elucidate part of the ossification mechanism. Thus, in the present study, we observed and evaluated minute ossifications in the PLL that did not exhibit symptoms of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The subjects in the present study were derived from serial autopsy cases from January 2009 to December 2013 at Toho University Omori Medical Center, Japan. Minute ossifications in the PLL from autopsy subjects without any history of OPLL were screened as high-density areas using micro-focus X-ray CT, and the foci were histologically examined. Subsequently, we conducted both micro-focus X-ray CT image analysis and histological examination, and evaluated the correlation between these findings and putative predictive factors reported in previous studies. A total of 103 individuals among the 267 subjects involved in the present study were analyzed within the study period. There were no cases involving OPLL identification prior to death, and no subjects presented with neurological symptoms of myelopathy. The incidence of cases involving high-density areas greater than 0.1 mm(2) in the PLL was 46.6 %, half of which revealed mature bone structures inside this area. Thus, the high-density areas comprised three types: a continuous posterior-annular fibrosus type (23 cases), an isolated posterior-annular fibrosus type (11 cases), and a posterior-vertebral type (29 cases). However, a positive correlation was observed between the proportion of high-density areas, age (Pearson r = 0.265, p < 0.01), and HbA1c (Pearson r = 0.294, p < 0.01). Histological examination confirmed that these high-density areas involved calcification with or without mature bone formation. We evaluated minute foci of calcification with and without ossification in the PLL from 103 cadavers, generating the following observations: 1. Minute calcification foci greater than 0.1 mm(2) were observed in the PLL of 48 cases (46.6 %), half of which revealed mature bone structures inside this area (23.3 %). 2. The proportion of minute calcification foci observed in the present study was correlated with age and glucose tolerance, suggesting changes in the OPLL in the early stage. 3. Three different mechanisms of ossification were suggested: The two structures developed behind the disc might reflect the elongation of enthesis or rupture of annular fibrosus, while the remaining structure developed behind the vertebral body might reflect a dystrophic calcification-based bony metaplasia sequence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2015.
All research outputs
#18,430,915
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#759
of 1,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,535
of 386,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#29
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.