↓ Skip to main content

The ThRombolysis in UnconTrolled Hypertension (TRUTH) protocol: an observational study on treatment strategy of elevated blood pressure in stroke patients eligible for IVT

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The ThRombolysis in UnconTrolled Hypertension (TRUTH) protocol: an observational study on treatment strategy of elevated blood pressure in stroke patients eligible for IVT
Published in
BMC Neurology, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12883-015-0493-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. P. Zonneveld, A. Algra, D. W. J. Dippel, L. J. Kappelle, R. J. van Oostenbrugge, Y. B. W. E. M. Roos, M. J. Wermer, H. B. van der Worp, P. J. Nederkoorn, N. D. Kruyt, for the TRUTH investigators

Abstract

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with (recombinant) tissue plasminogen activator is an effective treatment in acute ischemic stroke. However, IVT is contraindicated when blood pressure is above 185/110 mmHg, because of an increased risk on symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. In current Dutch clinical practice, two distinct strategies are used in this situation. The active strategy comprises lowering blood pressure with antihypertensive agents below these thresholds to allow start of IVT. In the conservative strategy, IVT is administered only when blood pressure drops spontaneously below protocolled thresholds. A retrospective analysis in two recent stroke trials showed a non-significant signal towards better functional outcome in the active group; robust evidence for either strategy, however, is lacking. We hypothesize that (I) the active strategy leads to a better functional outcome three months after acute ischemic stroke. Secondary hypotheses are that this effect occurs despite (II) increasing the number of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages, and could be attributable to (III) a higher rate of IVT treatments and (IV) a shorter door-to-needle time. The TRUTH is a prospective, observational, cluster-based, parallel group follow-up study; in which participating centers continue their current local treatment guidelines. Outcomes of patients admitted to centers with an active will be compared to those admitted to centers with a conservative strategy. The primary outcome is functional outcome on the modified Rankin Scale at three months. Secondary outcomes are symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, IVT treatment and door-to-needle time. We based our sample size estimate on an ordinal analysis of the mRS with the "proportional odds" model. With the aforementioned signal observed in a recent retrospective study in these patients as an estimate of the effect size and with alpha 0 · 05, this analysis would have an 80 % power with a total number of 600 patients. Corrections for expected imbalance in group size and clustering effects resulted in a sample size of 1235 patients. The TRUTH is the first large prospective study specifically studying IVT-candidates with elevated blood pressure, and has the potential to change clinical practice and optimize acute stroke care in these patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 13 26%
Unknown 14 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 34%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Psychology 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 16 32%