You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adverse effects of psychotherapy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0802-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rahel Klatte, Bernhard Strauss, Christoph Flückiger, Jenny Rosendahl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,572,063
of 25,529,543 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#850
of 2,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,377
of 346,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#35
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,529,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.