↓ Skip to main content

Risk multipliers for severe food anaphylaxis

Overview of attention for article published in World Allergy Organization Journal, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 891)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
93 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk multipliers for severe food anaphylaxis
Published in
World Allergy Organization Journal, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40413-015-0081-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter K Smith, Jonathan O’B Hourihane, Phil Lieberman

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is a severe, life threatening allergic reaction. In most fatal cases of food anaphylaxis, the fatality is not due merely to a simple, linear relationship between the allergen and exposure in a sensitized individual. Compounding factors such as the allergic disease burden-particularly the presence of asthma; comprehension of the potential severity of an event, training in the appropriate use of epinephrine, and emerging metabolic factors should be considered when assessing risk and establishing management strategies. This paper reviews the factors that contribute to the risk of severe anaphylactic events and provides a framework for the ongoing management of patients at risk of severe food allergy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 28 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#578,664
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from World Allergy Organization Journal
#18
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,442
of 392,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Allergy Organization Journal
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them