You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The prognostic value of markers of right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc10119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Coutance, Emmanuelle Cauderlier, Javed Ehtisham, Michèle Hamon, Martial Hamon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 44 | 23% |
| Unknown | 48 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 58 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,401,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,721
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,221
of 120,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#9
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.