↓ Skip to main content

Improving health-related fitness in children: the fit-4-Fun randomized controlled trial study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving health-related fitness in children: the fit-4-Fun randomized controlled trial study protocol
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-902
Pubmed ID
Authors

Narelle Eather, Philip J Morgan, David R Lubans

Abstract

Declining levels of physical fitness in children are linked to an increased risk of developing poor physical and mental health. Physical activity programs for children that involve regular high intensity physical activity, along with muscle and bone strengthening activities, have been identified by the World Health Organisation as a key strategy to reduce the escalating burden of ill health caused by non-communicable diseases. This paper reports the rationale and methods for a school-based intervention designed to improve physical fitness and physical activity levels of Grades 5 and 6 primary school children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 259 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 61 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 50 19%
Social Sciences 31 12%
Psychology 29 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 10%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 72 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,168,360
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,524
of 14,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,849
of 240,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#80
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.