↓ Skip to main content

Differential urinary glycoproteome analysis of type 2 diabetic nephropathy using 2D-LC–MS/MS and iTRAQ quantification

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential urinary glycoproteome analysis of type 2 diabetic nephropathy using 2D-LC–MS/MS and iTRAQ quantification
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12967-015-0712-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhengguang Guo, Xuejiao Liu, Menglin Li, Chen Shao, Jianling Tao, Wei Sun, Mingxi Li

Abstract

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of chronic kidney failure and end-stage kidney disease. More accurate and non-invasive test for the diagnosis and monitoring the progression of DN is urgently needed for the better care of such patients. In this study we utilized urinary glycoproteome to discover the differential proteins during the course of type 2 DN. The urinary glycoproteins from normal controls, normalbuminuira, microalbuminura, and macroalbuminuria patients were enriched by concanavalin A (ConA) and analyzed by 2DLC/MS/MS and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation quantification. A total of 478 proteins were identified and 408 were annotated as N-linked glycoproteins. A total of 72, 107 and 123 differential proteins were identified in normalbuminuria, microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria, respectively. By bioinformatics analysis, in normalbuminruia state, cell proliferation and cell movement were activated, which might reflect the compensatory phase during the disease development. In micro- and macro-albuminuria, cell death and apoptosis was activated, which might reflect the de-compensatory phase. Pathway analysis showed acute phase proteins, the member of high density lipoprotein and low density lipoprotein proteins were changed, indicating the role of the inflammatory response and lipid metabolism abnormality in the pathogenesis of DN. Six selected differential proteins were validated by Western Blot. Alpha-1-antitrypsin (SERPINA1) and Ceruloplasmin are the two markers with excellent area under curve values (0.929 and 1.000 respectively) to distinguish the microalbuminuria and normalbuminuria. For the first time, we found pro-epidermal growth factor and prolactin-inducible protein were decreased in macroalbuminuria stage, which might reflect the inhibition of cell viability and the activation of cell death in kidney. Above data indicated that urinary glycoproteome could be useful to distinguish the differences in protein profiles in different stages in DN, which will help better individualized care of patients in DN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Professor 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Chemistry 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,241,439
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,783
of 3,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,236
of 386,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#28
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.