You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Did changing primary care delivery models change performance? A population based study using health administrative data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-44 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R Liisa Jaakkimainen, Jan Barnsley, Julie Klein-Geltink, Alexander Kopp, Richard H Glazier |
| Abstract |
Primary care reform in Ontario, Canada started with the introduction of new enrollment models, the two largest of which are Family Health Networks (FHNs), a capitation-based model, and Family Health Groups (FHGs), a blended fee-for-service model. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in performance between FHNs and FHGs and to compare performance before and after physicians joined these new primary care groups. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |