↓ Skip to main content

CanVasc Recommendations for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitides – Executive Summary

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CanVasc Recommendations for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitides – Executive Summary
Published in
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40697-015-0078-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy McGeoch, Marinka Twilt, Leilani Famorca, Volodko Bakowsky, Lillian Barra, Susan Benseler, David A. Cabral, Simon Carette, Gerald P. Cox, Navjot Dhindsa, Christine Dipchand, Aurore Fifi-Mah, Michele Goulet, Nader Khalidi, Majed M. Khraishi, Patrick Liang, Nataliya Milman, Christian A. Pineau, Heather Reich, Nooshin Samadi, Kam Shojania, Regina Taylor-Gjevre, Tanveer E. Towheed, Judith Trudeau, Michael Walsh, Elaine Yacyshyn, Christian Pagnoux

Abstract

The Canadian Vasculitis research network (CanVasc) is composed of physicians from different medical specialties, including rheumatology and nephrology and researchers with expertise in vasculitis. One of its aims was to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides in Canada. This executive summary features the 19 recommendations and 17 statements addressing general AAV diagnosis and management, developed by CanVasc group based on a synthesis of existing international guidelines, other published supporting evidence and expert consensus considering the Canadian healthcare context.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 21%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 63%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,143,537
of 17,687,978 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
#76
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,161
of 375,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
#17
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,687,978 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.