↓ Skip to main content

The influence of excluding patients with bystander return of spontaneous circulation in the current OHCA database

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of excluding patients with bystander return of spontaneous circulation in the current OHCA database
Published in
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12245-018-0197-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Otani, Ryo Sagisaka, Hideharu Tanaka, Hiroshi Takyu, Takahiro Hara, Toru Shirakawa, Shota Tanaka, Akira Maki

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 9%
Librarian 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 55%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#9,691,533
of 15,226,794 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#307
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,792
of 274,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,226,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.