↓ Skip to main content

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei in a liver-transplanted patient: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei in a liver-transplanted patient: a case report
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12957-018-1482-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ebbe Billmann Thorgersen, Espen Melum, Trine Folseraas, Stein Gunnar Larsen, Pål Dag Line

Abstract

Diagnostic work-ups in transplanted immunosuppressed patients are a challenge as non-specific findings may be interpreted as transplant-related complications. If the disease in question is rare and slowly developing like pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), it is even more difficult. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and subsequent hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the recommended treatment for PMP even with extensive peritoneal spread. CRS-HIPEC for PMP after liver transplantation (LTX) has not been described before. A 48-year-old female patient with end-stage primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) underwent orthotopic LTX and subsequent pancreaticoduodenectomy after the finding of cholangiocarcinoma in situ in the native common bile duct. Ten years after the transplantation, she developed symptoms and signs suspected to represent graft-related complications. An extensive work-up revealed PMP. Upon reassessment, a cystic mass near the coecum could be seen on computed tomography scan 1 year after transplantation. The multidisiplinary team was hesitant to accept the patient for CRS-HIPEC because of extensive PMP and possible risk to the graft. However, she was eventually accepted and underwent the procedure. The Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) was 28 of 39, and surgical debulking was performed followed by HIPEC. The transplant control 2 months after surgery showed no harm to the graft. Previous LTX should not exclude the possibility for CRS-HIPEC in PMP, even with extensive burden of disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 28%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Philosophy 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,649,291
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1,026
of 2,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,901
of 335,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,065 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.