↓ Skip to main content

How to keep registered nurses working in New Zealand even as economic conditions improve

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to keep registered nurses working in New Zealand even as economic conditions improve
Published in
Human Resources for Health, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12960-018-0312-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willoughby Moloney, Des Gorman, Matthew Parsons, Gordon Cheung

Abstract

Many registered nurses (RNs) increased their participation in the New Zealand health workforce during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), resulting in low vacancy rates. However, based on the documented impact of improving economies, a mean RN age of about 50, and just-agreed substantive increases in RN pay rates, it is likely that many will soon leave or reduce the hours they work. This study aims to investigate whether improved financial security will encourage RNs to leave or reduce their work commitment and to identify the factors that influence such intentions. An exploratory study using a cross-sectional survey design. Data were collected in 2014-2015 via an e-survey of 2,910 RNs in New Zealand. Data were analysed by regression. We found that due to "burnout" and low "work engagement", both of which are strongly affected by workload and work-life interference, 22.6% of the RNs surveyed plan to leave work altogether and a further 32% plan to reduce their workforce participation when their financial situations improve. The findings justify the urgent cooperative development, implementation and evaluation of a comprehensive suite of RN 'retention' measures involving national nursing organisations, the RN regulator and health system employers and funders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 58 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 63 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#565
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,245
of 347,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.