↓ Skip to main content

Identifying factors which enhance capacity to engage in clinical education among podiatry practitioners: an action research project

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying factors which enhance capacity to engage in clinical education among podiatry practitioners: an action research project
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13047-015-0123-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally Abey, Susan Lea, Lynne Callaghan, Steve Shaw, Debbie Cotton

Abstract

Health profession students develop practical skills whilst integrating theory with practice in a real world environment as an important component of their training. Research in the area of practice placements has identified challenges and barriers to the delivery of effective placement learning. However, there has been little research in podiatry and the question of which factors impact upon clinical educators' capacity to engage with the role remains an under-researched area. This paper presents the second phase of an action research project designed to determine the factors that impact upon clinical educators' capacity to engage with the mentorship role. An online survey was developed and podiatry clinical educators recruited through National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. The survey included socio-demographic items, and questions relating to the factors identified as possible variables influencing clinical educator capacity; the latter was assessed using the 'Clinical Educator Capacity to Engage' scale (CECE). Descriptive statistics were used to explore demographic data whilst the relationship between the CECE and socio-demographic factors were examined using inferential statistics in relation to academic profile, career profile and organisation of the placement. The survey response rate was 42 % (n = 66). Multiple linear regression identified four independent variables which explain a significant proportion of the variability of the dependent variable, 'capacity to engage with clinical education', with an adjusted R2 of 0.428. The four variables were: protected mentorship time, clinical educator relationship with university, sign-off responsibility, and volunteer status. The identification of factors that impact upon clinical educators' capacity to engage in mentoring of students has relevance for strategic planning and policy-making with the emphasis upon capacity-building at an individual level, so that the key attitudes and characteristics that are linked with good clinical supervision are preserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 29%