Title |
Comparison of neuromuscular and quadriceps strengthening exercise in the treatment of varus malaligned knees with medial knee osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-276 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kim L Bennell, Thorlene Egerton, Tim V Wrigley, Paul W Hodges, Michael Hunt, Ewa M Roos, Mary Kyriakides, Ben Metcalf, Andrew Forbes, Eva Ageberg, Rana S Hinman |
Abstract |
Osteoarthritis of the knee involving predominantly the medial tibiofemoral compartment is common in older people, giving rise to pain and loss of function. Many people experience progressive worsening of the disease over time, particularly those with varus malalignment and increased medial knee joint load. Therefore, interventions that can reduce excessive medial knee loading may be beneficial in reducing the risk of structural progression. Traditional quadriceps strengthening can improve pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis but does not appear to reduce medial knee load. A neuromuscular exercise program, emphasising optimal alignment of the trunk and lower limb joints relative to one another, as well as quality of movement performance, while dynamically and functionally strengthening the lower limb muscles, may be able to reduce medial knee load. Such a program may also be superior to traditional quadriceps strengthening with respect to improved pain and physical function because of the functional and dynamic nature. This randomised controlled trial will investigate the effect of a neuromuscular exercise program on medial knee joint loading, pain and function in individuals with medial knee joint osteoarthritis. We hypothesise that the neuromuscular program will reduce medial knee load as well as pain and functional limitations to a greater extent than a traditional quadriceps strengthening program. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Ghana | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 5 | 1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 401 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 65 | 16% |
Student > Master | 60 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 8% |
Researcher | 34 | 8% |
Other | 69 | 17% |
Unknown | 112 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 13% |
Sports and Recreations | 43 | 10% |
Engineering | 14 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
Other | 42 | 10% |
Unknown | 135 | 32% |