↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian analysis of gene expression levels: statistical quantification of relative mRNA level across multiple strains or treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bayesian analysis of gene expression levels: statistical quantification of relative mRNA level across multiple strains or treatments
Published in
Genome Biology, November 2002
DOI 10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey P Townsend, Daniel L Hartl

Abstract

Methods of microarray analysis that suit experimentalists using the technology are vital. Many methodologies discard the quantitative results inherent in cDNA microarray comparisons or cannot be flexibly applied to multifactorial experimental design. Here we present a flexible, quantitative Bayesian framework. This framework can be used to analyze normalized microarray data acquired by any replicated experimental design in which any number of treatments, genotypes, or developmental states are studied using a continuous chain of comparisons. We apply this method to Saccharomyces cerevisiae microarray datasets on the transcriptional response to ethanol shock, to SNF2 and SWI1 deletion in rich and minimal media, and to wild-type and zap1 expression in media with high, medium, and low levels of zinc. The method is highly robust to missing data, and yields estimates of the magnitude of expression differences and experimental error variances on a per-gene basis. It reveals genes of interest that are differentially expressed at below the twofold level, genes with high 'fold-change' that are not statistically significantly different, and genes differentially regulated in quantitatively unanticipated ways. Anyone with replicated normalized cDNA microarray ratio datasets can use the freely available MacOS and Windows software, which yields increased biological insight by taking advantage of replication to discern important changes in expression level both above and below a twofold threshold. Not only does the method have utility at the moment, but also, within the Bayesian framework, there will be considerable opportunity for future development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 7%
Germany 4 4%
Portugal 2 2%
New Zealand 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 84 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 10%
Professor 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 2 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Engineering 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 4 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2015.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,233
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,002
of 134,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.