You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and evaluation of new mask protocols for gene expression profiling in humans and chimpanzees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-10-77 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donna M Toleno, Gabriel Renaud, Tyra G Wolfsberg, Munirul Islam, Derek E Wildman, Kimberly D Siegmund, Joseph G Hacia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 30% |
| Researcher | 5 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 55% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 10% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#4,181,070
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,609
of 7,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,920
of 93,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#9
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.