You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prehospital recognition and antibiotics for 999 patients with sepsis: protocol for a feasibility study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40814-018-0258-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chris Moore, Jenna Bulger, Matt Morgan, Timothy Driscoll, Alison Porter, Saiful Islam, Mike Smyth, Gavin Perkins, Bernadette Sewell, Timothy Rainer, Prabath Nanayakkara, Chukwudi Okolie, Susan Allen, Greg Fegan, Jan Davies, Theresa Foster, Nick Francis, Fang Gao Smith, Gemma Ellis, Tracy Shanahan, Robin Howe, Helen Snooks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
Ireland | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
Researcher | 7 | 7% |
Professor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 16% |
Unknown | 33 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 35 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,934,034
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#238
of 1,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,396
of 334,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.