↓ Skip to main content

Detection of G119S ace-1R mutation in field-collected Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes using allele-specific loop-mediated isothermal amplification (AS-LAMP) method

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of G119S ace-1R mutation in field-collected Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes using allele-specific loop-mediated isothermal amplification (AS-LAMP) method
Published in
Malaria Journal, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0968-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Athanase Badolo, Hironori Bando, Alphonse Traoré, Mami Ko-ketsu, Wamdaogo Moussa Guelbeogo, Hirotaka Kanuka, Hilary Ranson, N’Falé Sagnon, Shinya Fukumoto

Abstract

Malaria vectors have developed resistance to the four families of insecticides available for public health purposes. For example, the kdr mutation is associated with organochlorines and pyrethroids resistance. It is of particular concern that organophosphate and carbamate resistance associated with the G119S ace-1 (R) mutation has recently increased in West Africa in extent and frequency, and is now spreading through the Anopheles gambiae malaria vector population. There is an urgent need to improve resistance management using existing insecticides and new tools to quickly assess resistance level for rapid decision-making. DNA extracted from field-collected mosquitoes was used to develop the method. Specific primers were designed manually to match the mutation region and an additional mismatched nucleotide in the penultimate position to increase specificity. Other primers used are common to both wild and mutant types. The allele specific (AS)-LAMP method was compared to the PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and real-time PCR (RT-PCR) methods using the genomic DNA of 104 field-collected mosquitoes. The primers designed for LAMP were able to distinguish between the wild type (ace-1 (S) ) and mutated type allele (ace-1 (R) ). Detection time was 50 min for the wild type homozygous and 64 min for the heterozygous. No amplification of the resistant allele took place within the 75-min test period when using the wild type primers. For the ace-1 (R) resistant type, detection time was 51 min for the resistant homozygous and 55 min for the heterozygous. No amplification of the wild type allele took place within the 75-min test period when using the resistant type primers. Gel electrophoresis of LAMP products confirmed that amplification was primer-DNA specific, i.e., primers could only amplify their target specific DNA. AS-LAMP, PCR-RFLP, and RT-PCR showed no significant difference in the sensitivity and specificity of their ace-1 (R) detection ability. The AS-LAMP method could detect the ace-1 (R) mutation within 60 min, which is faster than conventional PCR-RFLP. This method may be used to quickly detect the ace-1 (R) mutation for rapid decision-making, even in less well-equipped laboratories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,431,664
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#5,048
of 5,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,721
of 387,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#127
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.