↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence, incidence, and age at diagnosis in Marfan Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence, incidence, and age at diagnosis in Marfan Syndrome
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13023-015-0369-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristian A. Groth, Hanne Hove, Kasper Kyhl, Lars Folkestad, Mette Gaustadnes, Niels Vejlstrup, Kirstine Stochholm, John R. Østergaard, Niels H. Andersen, Claus H. Gravholt

Abstract

Marfan syndrome is a genetic disorder with considerable morbidity and mortality. Presently, clinicians use the 2010 revised Ghent nosology, which includes optional genetic sequencing of the FBN1 gene, to diagnose patients. So far, only a few studies based on older diagnostic criteria have reported a wide range of prevalence and incidence. Our aim was to study prevalence, incidence, and age at diagnosis in patients with Marfan syndrome. Using unique Danish patient-registries, we identified all possible Marfan syndrome patients recorded by the Danish healthcare system (1977-2014). Following, we confirmed or rejected the diagnosis according to the 2010 revised Ghent nosology. We identified a total of 1628 persons with possible Marfan syndrome. We confirmed the diagnosis in 412, whereof 46 were deceased, yielding a maximum prevalence of 6.5/100,000 at the end of 2014. The annual median incidence was 0.19/100,000 (range: 0.0-0.7) which increased significantly with an incidence rate ratio of 1.03 (95 % CI: 1.02-1.04, p < 0.001). We found a median age at diagnose of 19.0 years (range: 0.0-74). The age at diagnosis increased during the study period, uninfluenced by the changes in diagnostic criteria. We found no gender differences. The increasing prevalence of Marfan syndrome during the study period is possibly due to build-up of a registry. Since early diagnosis is essential in preventing aortic events, diagnosing Marfan syndrome remains a task for both pediatricians and physicians caring for adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 197 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 18%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Other 15 8%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 60 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 71 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2015.
All research outputs
#14,242,087
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,567
of 2,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,821
of 387,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#56
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.