↓ Skip to main content

11C-choline vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing bone involvement in patients with multiple myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
11C-choline vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing bone involvement in patients with multiple myeloma
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, June 2007
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-5-68
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Nanni, Elena Zamagni, Michele Cavo, Domenico Rubello, Paola Tacchetti, Cinzia Pettinato, Mohsen Farsad, Paolo Castellucci, Valentina Ambrosini, Gian Carlo Montini, Adil Al-Nahhas, Roberto Franchi, Stefano Fanti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#16,110,489
of 24,514,423 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#555
of 2,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,670
of 71,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,514,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.