↓ Skip to main content

Bidirectional modulation of hyperalgesia via the specific control of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activity in the ACC

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Brain, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bidirectional modulation of hyperalgesia via the specific control of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activity in the ACC
Published in
Molecular Brain, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13041-015-0170-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sukjae Joshua Kang, Chuljung Kwak, Jaehyun Lee, Su-Eon Sim, Jaehoon Shim, Taehyuk Choi, Graham L. Collingridge, Min Zhuo, Bong-Kiun Kaang

Abstract

Neurons in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) are assumed to play important roles in the perception of nociceptive signals and the associated emotional responses. However, the neuronal types within the ACC that mediate these functions are poorly understood. In the present study, we used optogenetic techniques to selectively modulate excitatory pyramidal neurons and inhibitory interneurons in the ACC and to assess their ability to modulate peripheral mechanical hypersensitivity in freely moving mice. We found that selective activation of pyramidal neurons rapidly and acutely reduced nociceptive thresholds and that this effect was occluded in animals made hypersensitive using Freund's Complete Adjuvant (CFA). Conversely, inhibition of ACC pyramidal neurons rapidly and acutely reduced hypersensitivity induced by CFA treatment. A similar analgesic effect was induced by activation of parvalbumin (PV) expressing interneurons, whereas activation of somatostatin (SOM) expressing interneurons had no effect on pain thresholds. Our results provide direct evidence of the pivotal role of ACC excitatory neurons, and their regulation by PV expressing interneurons, in nociception.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 25%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 28 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,778,101
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Brain
#749
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,377
of 387,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Brain
#29
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.