↓ Skip to main content

The course of diaphragm atrophy in ventilated patients assessed with ultrasound: a longitudinal cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
53 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The course of diaphragm atrophy in ventilated patients assessed with ultrasound: a longitudinal cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-1141-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Schepens, Walter Verbrugghe, Karolien Dams, Bob Corthouts, Paul M. Parizel, Philippe G. Jorens

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation and the effect of respiratory muscle unloading on the diaphragm cause ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD). Atrophy of the diaphragmatic muscle is a major part of VIDD, and has a rapid onset in most animal models. We wanted to assess the clinical evolution and risk factors for VIDD in an adult intensive care unit (ICU) by measuring diaphragm thickness using ultrasound. We performed a single-centre observational cohort study, including 54 mechanically ventilated patients. The right hemidiaphragm was measured daily at the zone of apposition on the midaxillary line. Mean baseline thickness was 1.9 mm (SD ± 0.4 mm), and mean nadir was 1.3 mm (SD ± 0.4 mm), corresponding with a mean change in thickness of 32 % (95 % CI 27-37 %). Length of mechanical ventilation (MV) was associated with the degree of atrophy, whereas other known risk factors for muscle atrophy in an ICU were not. The largest decrease in thickness occurred during the first 72 hours of MV. Diaphragm atrophy occurs quickly in mechanically ventilated patients and can accurately be monitored using ultrasound. Length of MV, as opposed to other variables, is associated with the degree of atrophy. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02299986 . Registered 10/11/2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 252 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Student > Postgraduate 23 9%
Other 64 25%
Unknown 57 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Engineering 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 70 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,019,684
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#789
of 6,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,799
of 397,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#48
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.