You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Origin of the cell nucleus, mitosis and sex: roles of intracellular coevolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Direct, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6150-5-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Cavalier-Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Brazil | 7 | 2% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 3% |
| Unknown | 353 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 95 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 12% |
| Professor | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 65 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 228 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 73 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 7% |
| Unknown | 48 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,328,622
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#128
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,227
of 178,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them