↓ Skip to main content

The Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial (DANCAVAS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial (DANCAVAS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-1082-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen, Lars Melholt Rasmussen, Rikke Søgaard, Jess Lambrechtsen, Flemming Hald Steffensen, Lars Frost, Kenneth Egstrup, Grazina Urbonaviciene, Martin Busk, Michael Hecht Olsen, Hans Mickley, Jesper Hallas, Jes Sanddal Lindholt

Abstract

The significant increase in the average life expectancy has increased the societal challenge of managing serious age-related diseases, especially cancer and cardiovascular diseases. A routine check by a general practitioner is not sufficient to detect incipient cardiovascular disease. Population-based randomized clinically controlled screening trial. 45,000 Danish men aged 65-74 years living on the Island of Funen, or in the surrounding communities of Vejle and Silkeborg. No exclusion criteria are used. One-third will be invited to cardiovascular seven-faceted screening examinations at one of four locations. The screening will include: (1) low-dose non-contrast CT scan to detect coronary artery calcification and aortic/iliac aneurysms, (2) brachial and ankle blood pressure index to detect peripheral arterial disease and hypertension, (3) a telemetric assessment of the heart rhythm, and (4) a measurement of the cholesterol and plasma glucose levels. Up-to-date cardiovascular preventive treatment is recommended in case of positive findings. To investigate whether advanced cardiovascular screening will prevent death and cardiovascular events, and whether the possible health benefits are cost effective. Registry-based follow-up on all cause death (primary outcome), and costs after 3, 5 and 10 years (secondary outcome). Each of the 45,000 individuals is, by EPIDATA, given a random number from 1-100. Those numbered 67+ will be offered screening; the others will act as a control group. Only those randomized to the screening will be invited to the examination;the remaining participants will not. Numbers randomized: A total of 45,000 men will be randomized 1:2. Recruitment: Enrollment started October 2014. A 5 % reduction in overall mortality (HR = 0.95), with the risk for a type 1 error = 5 % and the risk for a type II error = 80 %, is expected. We expect a 2-year enrollment, a 10-year follow-up, and a median survival of 15 years among the controls. The attendance to screening is assumed to be 70 %. The primary aim of this so far stand-alone population-based, randomized trial will be to evaluate the health benefits and costeffectiveness of using non-contrast full truncus computer tomography (CT) scans (to measure coronary artery calcification (CAC) and identify aortic/iliac aneurysms) and measurements of the ankle brachial blood pressure index (ABI) as part of a multifocal screening and intervention program for CVD in men aged 65-74. Attendance rate and compliance to initiated preventive actions must be expected to become of major importance. Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN12157806 (21 March 2015).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 163 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 20%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 41 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 55 34%