↓ Skip to main content

ScanIndel: a hybrid framework for indel detection via gapped alignment, split reads and de novo assembly

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ScanIndel: a hybrid framework for indel detection via gapped alignment, split reads and de novo assembly
Published in
Genome Medicine, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13073-015-0251-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rendong Yang, Andrew C. Nelson, Christine Henzler, Bharat Thyagarajan, Kevin A. T. Silverstein

Abstract

Comprehensive identification of insertions/deletions (indels) across the full size spectrum from second generation sequencing is challenging due to the relatively short read length inherent in the technology. Different indel calling methods exist but are limited in detection to specific sizes with varying accuracy and resolution. We present ScanIndel, an integrated framework for detecting indels with multiple heuristics including gapped alignment, split reads and de novo assembly. Using simulation data, we demonstrate ScanIndel's superior sensitivity and specificity relative to several state-of-the-art indel callers across various coverage levels and indel sizes. ScanIndel yields higher predictive accuracy with lower computational cost compared with existing tools for both targeted resequencing data from tumor specimens and high coverage whole-genome sequencing data from the human NIST standard NA12878. Thus, we anticipate ScanIndel will improve indel analysis in both clinical and research settings. ScanIndel is implemented in Python, and is freely available for academic use at https://github.com/cauyrd/ScanIndel .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
China 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 28%
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,877,479
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,009
of 1,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,391
of 391,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#24
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.