↓ Skip to main content

Effects of carbohydrates-BCAAs-caffeine ingestion on performance and neuromuscular function during a 2-h treadmill run: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over placebo-controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of carbohydrates-BCAAs-caffeine ingestion on performance and neuromuscular function during a 2-h treadmill run: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over placebo-controlled study
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-8-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sébastien L Peltier, Lucile Vincent, Guillaume Y Millet, Pascal Sirvent, Jean-Benoît Morin, Michel Guerraz, André Geyssant, Jean-François Lescuyer, Léonard Feasson, Laurent Messonnier

Abstract

Carbohydrates (CHOs), branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) and caffeine are known to improve running performance. However, no information is available on the effects of a combination of these ingredients on performance and neuromuscular function during running.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 30 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 12%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,154,719
of 24,294,767 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#436
of 921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,411
of 431,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#411
of 855 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 855 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.