↓ Skip to main content

Sustained Aeration of Infant Lungs (SAIL) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sustained Aeration of Infant Lungs (SAIL) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0601-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth E Foglia, Louise S Owen, Marta Thio, Sarah J Ratcliffe, Gianluca Lista, Arjan te Pas, Helmut Hummler, Vinay Nadkarni, Anne Ades, Michael Posencheg, Martin Keszler, Peter Davis, Haresh Kirpalani

Abstract

Extremely preterm infants require assistance recruiting the lung to establish a functional residual capacity after birth. Sustained inflation (SI) combined with positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be a superior method of aerating the lung compared with intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) with PEEP in extremely preterm infants. The Sustained Aeration of Infant Lungs (SAIL) trial was designed to study this question. This multisite prospective randomized controlled unblinded trial will recruit 600 infants of 23 to 26 weeks gestational age who require respiratory support at birth. Infants in both arms will be treated with PEEP 5 to 7 cm H2O throughout the resuscitation. The study intervention consists of performing an initial SI (20 cm H20 for 15 seconds) followed by a second SI (25 cm H2O for 15 seconds), and then PEEP with or without IPPV, as needed. The control group will be treated with initial IPPV with PEEP. The primary outcome is the combined endpoint of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death at 36 weeks post-menstrual age. www.clinicaltrials.gov , Trial identifier NCT02139800 , Registered 13 May 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 35%