↓ Skip to main content

Nerve conduction study of the association between glycemic variability and diabetes neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nerve conduction study of the association between glycemic variability and diabetes neuropathy
Published in
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13098-018-0371-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miho Akaza, Itaru Akaza, Tadashi Kanouchi, Tetsuo Sasano, Yuki Sumi, Takanori Yokota

Abstract

It remains unclear whether glycemic variability is related to diabetes microvascular disease, especially diabetes peripheral neuropathy (DPN). We investigated the association between glycemic variability and DPN with type 1 or 2 diabetes. Forty patients (23 males and 17 females; aged 34-79 years) underwent continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and a nerve conduction study (NCS). Glycemic variability was estimated by mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) in CGM. DPN was quantitatively evaluated by NCS in the median, tibial, sural and medial plantar nerves. MAGE had a significantly positive correlation with disease duration and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (r = 0.462, p = 0.003; and r = 0.40, p = 0.011, respectively), and a significantly negative correlation with BMI and medial plantar compound nerve action potential amplitude (r = - 0.39, p = 0.012; and r = - 0.32, p = 0.042, respectively). Multivariate linear regression analysis with adjustment for clinical background showed that MAGE (β = - 0.49, p= 0.007) was independently associated with a higher risk of medial plantar neuropathy. Glycemic variability may be an independent risk factor for DPN.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 21%
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Unspecified 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Unspecified 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 33%