↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide characterization of intergenic polyadenylation sites redefines gene spaces in Arabidopsis thaliana

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide characterization of intergenic polyadenylation sites redefines gene spaces in Arabidopsis thaliana
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1691-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaohui Wu, Yong Zeng, Jinting Guan, Guoli Ji, Rongting Huang, Qingshun Q. Li

Abstract

Messenger RNA polyadenylation is an essential step for the maturation of most eukaryotic mRNAs. Accurate determination of poly(A) sites helps define the 3'-ends of genes, which is important for genome annotation and gene function research. Genomic studies have revealed the presence of poly(A) sites in intergenic regions, which may be attributed to 3'-UTR extensions and novel transcript units. However, there is no systematically evaluation of intergenic poly(A) sites in plants. Approximately 16,000 intergenic poly(A) site clusters (IPAC) in Arabidopsis thaliana were discovered and evaluated at the whole genome level. Based on the distributions of distance from IPACs to nearby sense and antisense genes, these IPACs were classified into three categories. About 70 % of them were from previously unannotated 3'-UTR extensions to known genes, which would extend 6985 transcripts of TAIR10 genome annotation beyond their 3'-ends, with a mean extension of 134 nucleotides. 1317 IPACs were originated from novel intergenic transcripts, 37 of which were likely to be associated with protein coding transcripts. 2957 IPACs corresponded to antisense transcripts for genes on the reverse strand, which might affect 2265 protein coding genes and 39 non-protein-coding genes, including long non-coding RNA genes. The rest of IPACs could be originated from transcriptional read-through or gene mis-annotations. The identified IPACs corresponding to novel transcripts, 3'-UTR extensions, and antisense transcription should be incorporated into current Arabidopsis genome annotation. Comprehensive characterization of IPACs from this study provides insights of alternative polyadenylation and antisense transcription in plants.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 28%
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 33%
Computer Science 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,297,343
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#9,281
of 10,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,891
of 262,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#242
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.