You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relative validation of the KiGGS Food Frequency Questionnaire among adolescents in Germany
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-10-133 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Truthmann, Gert BM Mensink, Almut Richter |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to determine the relative validity of the self-administered Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) "What do you eat?", which was used in the German National Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS 2003-2006). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Mali | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,863,251
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#463
of 1,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,773
of 242,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.