↓ Skip to main content

The challenges and promises of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells for use as a cell-based therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
365 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The challenges and promises of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells for use as a cell-based therapy
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13287-015-0240-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Zhang, Xiaowen Huang, Haijun Wang, Xiaoyan Liu, Tao Zhang, Yunchuan Wang, Dahai Hu

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are ideal for cell-based therapy in various inflammatory diseases because of their immunosuppressive and tissue repair properties. Moreover, their immunosuppressive properties and low immunogenicity contribute to a reduced or weakened immune response elicited by the implantation of allogeneic MSCs compared with other cell types. Therefore, implantation of allogeneic MSCs may be a promising cell-based therapy. In this review, we first summarize the unique advantages of allogeneic MSCs for therapeutic applications. Second, we critically analyze the factors influencing their therapeutic effects, including administration routes, detection time-points, disease models, differentiation of MSCs in vivo, and timing and dosage of MSC administration. Finally, current approaches to allogeneic MSC application are discussed. In conclusion, allogeneic MSCs are a promising option because of their low immunogenicity and immunosuppressive and tissue repair capabilities. Further investigations are needed to enhance the consistency and efficacy of MSCs when used as a cell-based therapy in inflammatory diseases as well as for tissue repair.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 362 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 17%
Student > Master 44 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Researcher 42 12%
Other 17 5%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 102 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 75 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 5%
Engineering 11 3%
Other 49 13%
Unknown 108 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,786,642
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#103
of 2,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,301
of 387,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#2
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.