You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From monocausality to systems thinking: a complementary and alternative conceptual approach for better understanding the development and prevention of sports injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Injury Epidemiology, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40621-015-0064-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Hulme, Caroline F. Finch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 16% |
| Australia | 6 | 14% |
| Spain | 4 | 9% |
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 66% |
| Scientists | 7 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 21% |
| Unknown | 49 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 51 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 61 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,260,170
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Injury Epidemiology
#73
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,695
of 397,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Injury Epidemiology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.