↓ Skip to main content

Self-medication among medical and pharmacy students in Bangladesh

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-medication among medical and pharmacy students in Bangladesh
Published in
BMC Research Notes, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1737-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naznin Alam, Nadia Saffoon, Riaz Uddin

Abstract

This cross-sectional survey examined the pattern of self-medication and factors associated with this practice among medical and pharmacy students in context to Bangladesh. The study used a self-administered questionnaire. A total of 500; 250 medical and 250 pharmacy, students participated in the study. As it is a comparative analysis between the medical and pharmacy students, we used independent t test and Chi square test. The findings indicated that the impact of self-medication is almost similar in medical and pharmacy students. It was found that medical students were more careful about getting advice from a physician or seeking professional help from some healthcare personnel. About the safety of self-medication pharmacy students were more aware than medical students were. The study also showed that female and younger medical or pharmacy students were more aware about self-medication. The current study presents a comprehensive picture of self-medication in medical and pharmacy students in Bangladesh. It is clear from the findings that practice of self-medication is highly prevalent in medical and pharmacy students in the country. This may potentially increase misuse or irrational use of medicines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 238 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 65 27%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 9 4%
Researcher 9 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 90 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 47 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 97 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,356,230
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,140
of 4,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,852
of 395,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#37
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.