You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Self-referrals in the emergency department: reasons why patients attend the emergency department without consulting a general practitioner first—a questionnaire study
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12245-015-0096-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicole Kraaijvanger, Douwe Rijpsma, Henk van Leeuwen, Michael Edwards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
Researcher | 9 | 16% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 12% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,732,124
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#324
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,196
of 399,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.