↓ Skip to main content

Symmetrical (SDMA) and asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA) in sepsis: high plasma levels as combined risk markers for sepsis survival

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Symmetrical (SDMA) and asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA) in sepsis: high plasma levels as combined risk markers for sepsis survival
Published in
Critical Care, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13054-018-2090-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Sebastian Winkler, Axel Nierhaus, Gilbert Rösler, Susanne Lezius, Olaf Harlandt, Edzard Schwedhelm, Rainer H. Böger, Stefan Kluge

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) regulates processes involved in sepsis progression, including vascular and immune function. NO is generated by nitric oxide synthases (NOS) from L-arginine. Cellular L-arginine uptake is inhibited by symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is a competitive inhibitor of NOS. Increased inhibitor blood concentrations lead to reduce NO bioavailability. The aim of this study was to determine whether plasma concentrations of SDMA and ADMA are markers for sepsis survival. This prospective, single center study involved 120 ICU patients with sepsis. Plasma SDMA and ADMA were measured on admission (day 1), day 3 and day 7 by mass spectrometry together with other laboratory markers. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was used to evaluate sepsis severity. Survival was documented until day 28. Groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, chi-squared test or non-parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA). Mortality was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. Specific risk groups were identified using a decision tree algorithm. Median plasma SDMA and ADMA levels were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors of sepsis: SDMA 1.14 vs. 0.82 μmol/L (P = 0.002) and ADMA 0.93 vs. 0.73 μmol/L (P = 0.016). ANOVA showed that increased plasma SDMA and ADMA concentrations were significantly associated with SOFA scores. The 28-day mortality was compared by chi-square test: for SDMA the mortality was 12% in the lower, 25% in the intermediate and 43% in the 75th percentile (P = 0.018); for ADMA the mortality was 18-20% in the lower and intermediate but 48% in the 75th percentile (P = 0.006). The highest mortality (61%) was found in patients with plasma SDMA > 1.34 together with ADMA levels > 0.97 μmol/L. Increased plasma concentrations of SDMA and ADMA are associated with sepsis severity. Therefore, our findings suggest reduced NO bioavailability in non-survivors of sepsis. One may use individual SDMA and ADMA levels to identify patients at risk. In view of the pathophysiological role of NO we conclude that the vascular system and immune response are most severely affected when SDMA and ADMA levels are high.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 11%
Engineering 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,848,918
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,897
of 6,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,387
of 352,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#71
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.