↓ Skip to main content

Fertility in classical galactosaemia, a study of N-glycan, hormonal and inflammatory gene interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fertility in classical galactosaemia, a study of N-glycan, hormonal and inflammatory gene interactions
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13023-018-0906-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugh-Owen Colhoun, Estela M. Rubio Gozalbo, Annet M. Bosch, Ina Knerr, Charlotte Dawson, Jennifer Brady, Marie Galligan, Karolina Stepien, Roisin O’Flaherty, C. Catherine Moss, P. Peter Barker, Maria Fitzgibbon, Peter P. Doran, Eileen P. Treacy

Abstract

Classical Galactosaemia (CG) (OMIM #230400) is a rare inborn error of galactose metabolism caused by deficiency of the enzyme galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (GALT). Long-term complications persist in treated patients despite dietary galactose restriction with significant variations in outcomes suggesting epigenetic glycosylation influences. Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (POI) is a very significant complication affecting females with follicular depletion noted in early life. We studied specific glycan synthesis, leptin system and inflammatory gene expression in white blood cells as potential biomarkers of infertility in 54 adults with CG adults (27 females and 27 males) (age range 17-51 yr) on a galactose-restricted diet in a multi-site Irish and Dutch study. Gene expression profiles were tested for correlation with a serum Ultra-high Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC)-Immunoglobulin (IgG)-N-glycan galactose incorporation assay and endocrine measurements. Twenty five CG females (93%) had clinical and biochemical evidence of POI. As expected, the CG female patients, influenced by hormone replacement therapy, and the healthy controls of both genders showed a positive correlation between log leptin and BMI but this correlation was not apparent in CG males. The strongest correlations between serum leptin levels, hormones, G-ratio (galactose incorporation assay) and gene expression data were observed between leptin, its gene and G-Ratios data (rs = - 0.68) and (rs = - 0.94) respectively with lower circulating leptin in CG patients with reduced IgG galactosylation. In CG patients (males and females analysed as one group), the key glycan synthesis modifier genes MGAT3 and FUT8, which influence glycan chain bisecting and fucosylation and subsequent cell signalling and adhesion, were found to be significantly upregulated (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05) and also the glycan synthesis gene ALG9 (p < 0.01). Both leptin signalling genes LEP and LEPR were found to be upregulated (p < 0.01) as was the inflammatory genes ANXA1 and ICAM1 and the apoptosis gene SEPT4 (p < 0.01). These results validate our previous findings and provide novel experimental evidence for dysregulation of genes LEP, LEPR, ANXA1, ICAM1 and SEPT4 for CG patients and combined with our findings of abnormalities of IgG glycosylation, hormonal and leptin analyses elaborate on the systemic glycosylation and cell signalling abnormalities evident in CG which likely influence the pathophysiology of POI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2018.
All research outputs
#13,313,060
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,307
of 2,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,224
of 343,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#28
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.