↓ Skip to main content

Examining the impact of accreditation on a primary healthcare organization in Qatar

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examining the impact of accreditation on a primary healthcare organization in Qatar
Published in
BMC Medical Education, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12909-018-1321-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alia Ghareeb, Hana Said, Mohamad El Zoghbi

Abstract

Although a modest body of literature exists on accreditation, little research was conducted on the impact of accreditation on primary healthcare organizations in the Middle East. This study assessed the changes resulting from the integration of Accreditation Canada International's accreditation program in a primary healthcare organization in the State of Qatar. The study investigated how accreditation helped introduce organizational changes through promoting organizational learning as well as quality improvement initiatives. Applying a quantitative design, a structured questionnaire was used to collect data from 500 staff. The study used Spearman's correlation coefficient to analyze the collected survey data. Overall employees agreed on the positive impact of accreditation. The results showed a significantly positive correlation between staff perception of accreditation and of quality of care. The two dominant cultures at Primary Health Care Corporation were "group" (with a score of 28.61) and "hierarchical" (with a score of 26.59). The results showed a positive correlation between staff perception of accreditation and their perception of culture type whenever the culture was identified as "group". This study provided much-needed insight on the possible changes that organizations might go through in relation to quality improvement and organizational learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 123 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Lecturer 10 8%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 50 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 7%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 56 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,990,409
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,648
of 3,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,210
of 342,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#50
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.