You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Short and long-term effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in interstitial lung diseases: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12931-018-0884-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia Perez-Bogerd, Wim Wuyts, Veronica Barbier, Heleen Demeyer, Alain Van Muylem, Wim Janssens, Thierry Troosters |
| Abstract |
Few data are available on the long-term effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and on long PR programs in interstitial lung diseases (ILD). We aimed to evaluate the effects of PR on exercise capacity (6-Minute Walking Distance, 6MWD; Peak Work Rate, Wmax), quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, SGRQ), quadriceps force (QF) and objectively measured physical activity in ILD after the 6-month PR-program and after 1 year. 60 patients (64 ± 11 years; 62% males; 23% with IPF) were randomly assigned to receive a 6 month-PR program or usual medical care. Exercise capacity, quality of life and muscle force increased significantly after the program as compared to control (mean,95%CI[ll to ul]; 6MWD + 72,[36 to 108] m; Wmax 19, [8 to 29]%pred; SGRQ - 12,[- 19 to - 6] points; QF 10, [1 to 18] %pred). The gain was sustained after 1 year (6MWD 73,[28 to 118] m; Wmax 23, [10 to 35]%pred; SGRQ - 11,[- 18 to - 4] points; QF 9.5, [1 to 18] %pred). Physical activity did not change. PR improves exercise tolerance, health status and muscle force in ILD. The benefits are maintained at 1-year follow-up. The intervention did not change physical activity. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00882817 . |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 32% |
| United States | 10 | 11% |
| Spain | 5 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Moldova, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 66% |
| Scientists | 16 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 65 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 70 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2020.
All research outputs
#594,089
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#42
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,844
of 351,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#1
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.