↓ Skip to main content

Qualitative and mixed methods in systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
37 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Qualitative and mixed methods in systematic reviews
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13643-015-0151-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Gough

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 247 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 16%
Researcher 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 66 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 32 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 9%
Psychology 18 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 6%
Other 57 23%
Unknown 76 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,441,198
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#225
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,195
of 392,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#9
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.