↓ Skip to main content

Protein aggregation, structural disorder and RNA-binding ability: a new approach for physico-chemical and gene ontology classification of multiple datasets

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein aggregation, structural disorder and RNA-binding ability: a new approach for physico-chemical and gene ontology classification of multiple datasets
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-2280-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petr Klus, Riccardo Delli Ponti, Carmen Maria Livi, Gian Gaetano Tartaglia

Abstract

Comparison between multiple protein datasets requires the choice of an appropriate reference system and a number of variables to describe their differences. Here we introduce an innovative approach to discriminate multiple protein datasets (multiCM) and to measure enrichments in gene ontology terms (cleverGO) using semantic similarities. We illustrate the powerfulness of our approach by investigating the links between RNA-binding ability and other protein features, such as structural disorder and aggregation, in S. cerevisiae, C. elegans, M. musculus and H. sapiens. Our results are in striking agreement with available experimental evidence and unravel features that are key to understand the mechanisms regulating cellular homeostasis. In an intuitive way, multiCM and cleverGO provide accurate classifications of physico-chemical features and annotations of biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components, which is extremely useful for the discovery and characterization of new trends in protein datasets. The multiCM and cleverGO can be freely accessed on the Web at http://www.tartaglialab.com/cs_multi/submission and http://www.tartaglialab.com/GO_analyser/universal . Each of the pages contains links to the corresponding documentation and tutorial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 21%
Computer Science 2 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,451,930
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,002
of 10,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,939
of 390,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#157
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.