↓ Skip to main content

Understanding home delivery in a context of user fee reduction: a cross-sectional mixed methods study in rural Burkina Faso

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding home delivery in a context of user fee reduction: a cross-sectional mixed methods study in rural Burkina Faso
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0764-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuela De Allegri, Justin Tiendrebéogo, Olaf Müller, Maurice Yé, Albrecht Jahn, Valéry Ridde

Abstract

Several African countries have recently reduced/removed user fees for maternal care, producing considerable increases in the utilization of delivery services. Still, across settings, a conspicuous number of women continue to deliver at home. This study explores reasons for home delivery in rural Burkina Faso, where a successful user fee reduction policy is in place since 2007. The study took place in the Nouna Health District and adopted a triangulation mixed methods design, combining quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis methods. The quantitative component relied on use of data from the 2011 round of a panel household survey conducted on 1130 households. We collected data on utilization of delivery services from all women who had experienced a delivery in the previous twelve months and investigated factors associated with home delivery using multivariate logistic regression. The qualitative component relied on a series of open-ended interviews with 55 purposely selected households and 13 village leaders. We analyzed data using a mixture of inductive and deductive coding. Of the 420 women who reported a delivery, 47 (11 %) had delivered at home. Random effect multivariate logistic regression revealed a clear, albeit not significant trend for women from a lower socio-economic status and living outside an area to deliver at home. Distance to the health facility was found to be positively significantly associated with home delivery. Qualitative findings indicated that women and their households valued facility-based delivery above home delivery, suggesting that cultural factors do not shape the decision where to deliver. Qualitative findings confirmed that geographical access, defined in relation to the condition of the roads and the high transaction costs associated with travel, and the cost-sharing fees still applied at point of use represent two major barriers to access facility-based delivery. Findings suggest that the current policy in Burkina Faso, as similar policies in the region, should be expanded to remove fees at point of use completely and to incorporate benefits/solutions to support the transport of women in labor to the health facility in due time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 180 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 27%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 49 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 40 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 16%
Social Sciences 28 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 59 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,892,473
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,357
of 4,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,463
of 397,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#18
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.