↓ Skip to main content

A review of acoustic telemetry in Europe and the need for a regional aquatic telemetry network

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 164)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of acoustic telemetry in Europe and the need for a regional aquatic telemetry network
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40317-018-0156-0
Authors

David Abecasis, Andre Steckenreuter, Jan Reubens, Kim Aarestrup, Josep Alós, Fabio Badalamenti, Lenore Bajona, Patrick Boylan, Klaas Deneudt, Larry Greenberg, Niels Brevé, Francisco Hernández, Nick Humphries, Carl Meyer, David Sims, Eva B. Thorstad, Alan M. Walker, Fred Whoriskey, Pedro Afonso

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 27%
Researcher 21 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 23%
Engineering 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 21 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,507,313
of 16,055,825 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#42
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,603
of 278,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,055,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them