↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Outcome analysis of 215 patients with parotid gland tumors: a retrospective cohort analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Outcome analysis of 215 patients with parotid gland tumors: a retrospective cohort analysis
Published in
Journal of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40463-015-0105-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boban M. Erovic, Manish D. Shah, Guillem Bruch, Meredith Johnston, John Kim, Brian O’Sullivan, Bayardo Perez-Ordonez, Ilan Weinreb, Eshetu G. Atenafu, John R. de Almeida, Patrick J. Gullane, Dale Brown, Ralph W. Gilbert, Jonathan C. Irish, David P. Goldstein

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2015.
All research outputs
#3,286,106
of 6,787,729 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery
#53
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,877
of 274,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,787,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.