You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The supportive care needs of women experiencing gynaecological cancer: a Western Australian cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-018-4812-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie Williams, Georgia Griffin, Victoria Farrell, Alethea Rea, Kevin Murray, Yvonne L. Hauck |
| Abstract |
Women diagnosed with gynaecological cancer experience supportive care needs that require care provision to reduce the impact on their lives. International evidence suggests supportive care needs of women with gynaecological cancer are not being met and provision of holistic care is a priority area for action. Knowledge on gynaecological cancer supportive care needs is limited, specifically comparison of needs and cancer gynaecological subtype. Our aim was to identify supportive care needs of Western Australian women experiencing gynaecological cancer, their satisfaction with help and explore associations between participant's demographic characteristics and identified needs. A cross-sectional design incorporating a modified version of the Supportive Care Needs Survey - short form (SCNS-SF34) assessed 37 supportive care needs under five domains in conjunction with demographic data. Three hundred and forty three women with gynaecological cancer attending a tertiary public referral hospital completed the survey over 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using the R environment for statistical computing. A linear regression model was fitted with factor scores for each domain and demographic characteristics as explanatory variables. Three hundred and three women (83%) identified at least one moderate or high level supportive care need. The five highest ranked needs were, 'being informed about your test results as soon as feasible' (54.8%), 'fears about cancer spreading' (53.7%), 'being treated like a person not just another case' (51.9%), 'being informed about cancer which is under control or diminishing (that is, remission)' (50.7%), and 'being adequately informed about the benefits and side-effects of treatments before you choose to have them' (49.9%). Eight of the top ten needs were from the 'health system and information' domain. Associations between supportive care items and demographic variables revealed 'cancer type', and 'time since completion of treatment' had no impact on level of perceived need for any domain. Western Australian women with gynaecological cancer identified a high level of supportive care needs. The implementation of a supportive care screening tool is recommended to ensure needs are identified and care is patient-centred. Early identification and management of needs may help to reduce the burden on health system resources for managing ongoing needs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 29% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2018.
All research outputs
#13,237,582
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,812
of 8,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,386
of 342,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#55
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.