You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CT of ovarian cancer: 3D cinematic rendering for preoperative evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ovarian Research, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13048-018-0461-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi-ren Jin, Xie-lan Yang, Qin-qing Li, Zhi-ling Yan, Hong-ying Yang, Chengde Liao |
| Abstract |
Ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecologic malignancy. As the primary imaging modality, computed tomography (CT) can provide staging information for preoperative planning and determination of surgical resectability. As a new three-dimensional postprocessing tool for CT images, cinematic rendering (CR) has the potential to depict anatomic details accurately. (Case 1) A 44-year-old married woman was diagnosed with recurrent ovarian cancer. CT images indicated the recurrent nodules and masses in the pelvic cavity and the upper middle abdominal peritoneum. The CR image showed that the multiple metastatic lesions and lymph nodes could not be completely removed by reoperation. The patient agreed to receive continued chemotherapy. (Case 2) A 51-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital due to abdominal distension and defecation that had increased for 6 months, with aggravation over the past 3 days. CT examination found cystic and solid masses in the bilateral ovarian area. The CR image demonstrated that the ovarian mass violated the posterior wall of the bladder and the anterior rectal wall. The preoperational imaging evaluation ensured the safety of the operation. CR could improve the visualization of ovarian cancer masses, metastatic lymph nodes, and peritoneal metastases. CR has a good clinical value and will be more helpful in the preoperational evaluation of ovarian cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 39% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,650,639
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ovarian Research
#329
of 604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,436
of 341,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ovarian Research
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.