↓ Skip to main content

The impact of education on cortical thickness in amyloid-negative subcortical vascular dementia: cognitive reserve hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of education on cortical thickness in amyloid-negative subcortical vascular dementia: cognitive reserve hypothesis
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13195-018-0432-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Na-Yeon Jung, Hanna Cho, Yeo Jin Kim, Hee Jin Kim, Jong Min Lee, Seongbeom Park, Sung Tae Kim, Eun-Joo Kim, Jae Seung Kim, Seung Hwan Moon, Jae-Hong Lee, Michael Ewers, Duk L Na, Sang Won Seo

Abstract

The protective effect of education has been well established in Alzheimer's disease, whereas its role in patients with isolated cerebrovascular diseases remains unclear. We examined the correlation of education with cortical thickness and cerebral small vessel disease markers in patients with pure subcortical vascular mild cognitive impairment (svMCI) and patients with pure subcortical vascular dementia (SVaD). We analyzed 45 patients with svMCI and 47 patients with SVaD with negative results on Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomographic imaging who underwent structural brain magnetic resonance imaging. The main outcome was cortical thickness measured using surface-based morphometric analysis. We also assessed the volumes of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and numbers of lacunes as other outcomes. To investigate the correlation of education with cortical thickness, WMH volume, and number of lacunes, multiple linear regression analyses were performed after controlling for covariates, including Mini Mental State Examination, in the svMCI and SVaD groups. In the SVaD group, higher education was correlated with more severe cortical thinning in the bilateral dorsolateral frontal, left medial frontal, and parahippocampal areas, whereas there was no correlation of education with cortical thickness in the svMCI group. There was no correlation between education and cerebral small vessel disease, including WMH and lacunes, in both patients with svMCI and patients with SVaD. Our findings suggest that the compensatory effects of education on cortical thinning apply to patients with SVaD, which might be explained by the cognitive reserve hypothesis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 33 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Psychology 6 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 35 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,171,635
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#463
of 1,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,880
of 341,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#24
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.