You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A clinically relevant gene signature in triple negative and basal-like breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/bcr3035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Achim Rody, Thomas Karn, Cornelia Liedtke, Lajos Pusztai, Eugen Ruckhaeberle, Lars Hanker, Regine Gaetje, Christine Solbach, Andre Ahr, Dirk Metzler, Marcus Schmidt, Volkmar Müller, Uwe Holtrich, Manfred Kaufmann |
| Abstract |
Current prognostic gene expression profiles for breast cancer mainly reflect proliferation status and are most useful in ER-positive cancers. Triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) are clinically heterogeneous and prognostic markers and biology-based therapies are needed to better treat this disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 27% |
| Researcher | 44 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Professor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#824
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,342
of 145,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.